- work untethered,
- provide their own workplace--one that meets the companys' requirement for privacy and quiet,
- purchase and maintain their own computer and broadband service,
- and meet the stringent security standards required for handling credit card numbers, social security numbers, medical information, etc.,
"We started out with a traditional big-building, cubicle-farm approach but quickly--or, actually not so quickly--learned that the kind of people who made great brand ambassadors didn't want to sit in a cubicle eight hours a day earning $10/hour. Initially we thought, well, maybe we're in the wrong place to attract the kind of people we need. Over the next several years we pulled up stakes and moved three times in search of a reliable pool of talent; to no avail. There just had to be a better way. In 2001, we completely abandoned the bricks and mortar approach for a home-based agent model. That decision, it turns out, made all the difference."
Here are just some of the benefits VIPdesk realized when they sent their people home:
- The average age of their customer service representatives went from mid-twenties to early forties.
- They attracted more educated people. Over 90% of their reps have college experience and 5% have advanced degrees.
- Their retention rate went from 100% turnover, to 90% retention.
- Their employee to manager ratio went from 12 to 1, to 25 to 1.
VIPdesk's experience is not unique. Time and again, companies have found that a home-based approach yields more qualified, more engaged, more professional, more available, more productive, and less expensive (by a long damn shot) workforce
If an industry can achieve unprecedented success by sending its lowest paid employees home, why doesn't the rest of the world follow suit?


